CVE-2006-2656

CVSS V2 High 7.5 CVSS V3 None
Description
Stack-based buffer overflow in the tiffsplit command in libtiff 3.8.2 and earlier might might allow attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long filename. NOTE: tiffsplit is not setuid. If there is not a common scenario under which tiffsplit is called with attacker-controlled command line arguments, then perhaps this issue should not be included in CVE.
Overview
  • CVE ID
  • CVE-2006-2656
  • Assigner
  • secalert@redhat.com
  • Vulnerability Status
  • Modified
  • Published Version
  • 2006-05-30T18:02:00
  • Last Modified Date
  • 2023-02-13T02:16:32
CPE Configuration (Product)
CPE Vulnerable Operator Version Start Version End
cpe:2.3:a:libtiff:libtiff:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* 1 OR 3.8.2
cpe:2.3:a:libtiff:libtiff:3.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* 1 OR
cpe:2.3:a:libtiff:libtiff:3.5.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* 1 OR
cpe:2.3:a:libtiff:libtiff:3.5.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* 1 OR
cpe:2.3:a:libtiff:libtiff:3.5.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* 1 OR
cpe:2.3:a:libtiff:libtiff:3.5.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* 1 OR
cpe:2.3:a:libtiff:libtiff:3.5.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:* 1 OR
cpe:2.3:a:libtiff:libtiff:3.5.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:* 1 OR
cpe:2.3:a:libtiff:libtiff:3.5.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:* 1 OR
cpe:2.3:a:libtiff:libtiff:3.6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* 1 OR
cpe:2.3:a:libtiff:libtiff:3.6.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* 1 OR
cpe:2.3:a:libtiff:libtiff:3.7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* 1 OR
cpe:2.3:a:libtiff:libtiff:3.7.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* 1 OR
cpe:2.3:a:libtiff:libtiff:3.8.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* 1 OR
cpe:2.3:a:libtiff:libtiff:3.8.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* 1 OR
CVSS Version 2
  • Version
  • 2.0
  • Vector String
  • AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
  • Access Vector
  • NETWORK
  • Access Compatibility
  • LOW
  • Authentication
  • NONE
  • Confidentiality Impact
  • PARTIAL
  • Integrity Impact
  • PARTIAL
  • Availability Impact
  • PARTIAL
  • Base Score
  • 7.5
  • Severity
  • HIGH
  • Exploitability Score
  • 10
  • Impact Score
  • 6.4
History
Created Old Value New Value Data Type Notes
2022-05-10 18:36:36 Added to TrackCVE
2023-02-13 03:01:29 2023-02-13T02:16:32 CVE Modified Date updated
2023-02-13 03:01:30 Stack-based buffer overflow in the tiffsplit command in libtiff 3.8.2 and earlier might might allow attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long filename. NOTE: tiffsplit is not setuid. If there is not a common scenario under which tiffsplit is called with attacker-controlled command line arguments, then perhaps this issue should not be included in CVE. Stack-based buffer overflow in the tiffsplit command in libtiff 3.8.2 and earlier might might allow attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long filename. NOTE: tiffsplit is not setuid. If there is not a common scenario under which tiffsplit is called with attacker-controlled command line arguments, then perhaps this issue should not be included in CVE. Description updated